<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cloudbook laptop from Everex &#8211; is it &#8220;the way to go&#8221;? Or just &#8220;way too slow&#8221;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.internetling.com/2008/03/01/cloudbook-laptop-from-everex-is-it-the-way-to-go-or-just-way-too-slow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.internetling.com/2008/03/01/cloudbook-laptop-from-everex-is-it-the-way-to-go-or-just-way-too-slow/</link>
	<description>Linux, open source and delicious cake</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:33:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.internetling.com/2008/03/01/cloudbook-laptop-from-everex-is-it-the-way-to-go-or-just-way-too-slow/comment-page-1/#comment-620</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 22:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetling.com/2008/03/01/cloudbook-laptop-from-everex-is-it-the-way-to-go-or-just-way-too-slow/#comment-620</guid>
		<description>Maybe you could give PuppyLinux a shot :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe you could give PuppyLinux a shot <img src='http://www.internetling.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kuba</title>
		<link>http://www.internetling.com/2008/03/01/cloudbook-laptop-from-everex-is-it-the-way-to-go-or-just-way-too-slow/comment-page-1/#comment-619</link>
		<dc:creator>Kuba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 22:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetling.com/2008/03/01/cloudbook-laptop-from-everex-is-it-the-way-to-go-or-just-way-too-slow/#comment-619</guid>
		<description>I am running win2003 server r2 for me this system is the fastest. Gos was really slow but i would like to put another linux in there. Unfortunatelly whatever i put in there pc just stuck like with knoppix, suse, ubuntu. with other distribution x windows are not starting you can have &quot;fun&quot; in bash. Please advise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am running win2003 server r2 for me this system is the fastest. Gos was really slow but i would like to put another linux in there. Unfortunatelly whatever i put in there pc just stuck like with knoppix, suse, ubuntu. with other distribution x windows are not starting you can have &#8220;fun&#8221; in bash. Please advise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Flash</title>
		<link>http://www.internetling.com/2008/03/01/cloudbook-laptop-from-everex-is-it-the-way-to-go-or-just-way-too-slow/comment-page-1/#comment-502</link>
		<dc:creator>The Flash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 11:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetling.com/2008/03/01/cloudbook-laptop-from-everex-is-it-the-way-to-go-or-just-way-too-slow/#comment-502</guid>
		<description>The Cloudbook was around first, in various formats, based upon the NanoBook reference design from VIA technologies - long before the Asus EEE.  So, rip-off?  Not quite.

While the Cloudbook may have a few issues, it seems most negative reviews are based upon reference to a first-use PC like a Mac or Windows machine, which this is NOT supposed to be.  It is an UMPC, which would not be anyone&#039;s only computer - just a travel companion or sort-of a &quot;really advanced PDA&quot;.

Even with it&#039;s issues, the Cloudbook still works well for its intended purpose. Most, if not all, of its issues would be resolved if they would load it with the real Ubuntu distro instead of this Gnome hybrid hack of gOS. And loading Windows on one of these is unecessary and would only tend to overload its resources - and for what purpose? 

Yes, installing more RAM would be a good idea, and Everex has made this difficult to do.  However, aside from the startup time, why does it need to go faster?  It&#039;s for checking your email, writing memos and playing the occasional game of solitaire. I think we&#039;re so used to super fast PCs now, that many of us are looking at this through the wrong pair of glasses.

And many reviewers seem to know only about one of the &quot;popular&quot; brands of OS and are not necessarily familiar with the various Linux distributions.  But when you&#039;ve got one of &quot;everything&quot; sitting in your home or office, then you might be qualified to speak.  But most of you don&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Cloudbook was around first, in various formats, based upon the NanoBook reference design from VIA technologies &#8211; long before the Asus EEE.  So, rip-off?  Not quite.</p>
<p>While the Cloudbook may have a few issues, it seems most negative reviews are based upon reference to a first-use PC like a Mac or Windows machine, which this is NOT supposed to be.  It is an UMPC, which would not be anyone&#8217;s only computer &#8211; just a travel companion or sort-of a &#8220;really advanced PDA&#8221;.</p>
<p>Even with it&#8217;s issues, the Cloudbook still works well for its intended purpose. Most, if not all, of its issues would be resolved if they would load it with the real Ubuntu distro instead of this Gnome hybrid hack of gOS. And loading Windows on one of these is unecessary and would only tend to overload its resources &#8211; and for what purpose? </p>
<p>Yes, installing more RAM would be a good idea, and Everex has made this difficult to do.  However, aside from the startup time, why does it need to go faster?  It&#8217;s for checking your email, writing memos and playing the occasional game of solitaire. I think we&#8217;re so used to super fast PCs now, that many of us are looking at this through the wrong pair of glasses.</p>
<p>And many reviewers seem to know only about one of the &#8220;popular&#8221; brands of OS and are not necessarily familiar with the various Linux distributions.  But when you&#8217;ve got one of &#8220;everything&#8221; sitting in your home or office, then you might be qualified to speak.  But most of you don&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Em</title>
		<link>http://www.internetling.com/2008/03/01/cloudbook-laptop-from-everex-is-it-the-way-to-go-or-just-way-too-slow/comment-page-1/#comment-336</link>
		<dc:creator>Em</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetling.com/2008/03/01/cloudbook-laptop-from-everex-is-it-the-way-to-go-or-just-way-too-slow/#comment-336</guid>
		<description>Hi Greg-I think gOS have to be applauded for trying to be a web applications OS aimed at casual users (In the same way that Asus originally shipped a modified Xandros on the 1st EEPC&#039;s)and blagging themselves onto  Everex hardware to be sold in Walmart. I tried version 1.1 and the 2.0 beta of gOS and they were both quite usable for what it was intended for.I believe the rushed modified Gnome based version on the cloudbook was done to solve some problems they originally had on the cloudbook hardware. Opengeu and others a better attempt at marrying Ubuntu, E17 and Gnome without the memory required for a full Gnome desktop.I&#039;m interested to see if users can get a better performance with other distros on the cloudbook.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Greg-I think gOS have to be applauded for trying to be a web applications OS aimed at casual users (In the same way that Asus originally shipped a modified Xandros on the 1st EEPC&#8217;s)and blagging themselves onto  Everex hardware to be sold in Walmart. I tried version 1.1 and the 2.0 beta of gOS and they were both quite usable for what it was intended for.I believe the rushed modified Gnome based version on the cloudbook was done to solve some problems they originally had on the cloudbook hardware. Opengeu and others a better attempt at marrying Ubuntu, E17 and Gnome without the memory required for a full Gnome desktop.I&#8217;m interested to see if users can get a better performance with other distros on the cloudbook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.internetling.com/2008/03/01/cloudbook-laptop-from-everex-is-it-the-way-to-go-or-just-way-too-slow/comment-page-1/#comment-331</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetling.com/2008/03/01/cloudbook-laptop-from-everex-is-it-the-way-to-go-or-just-way-too-slow/#comment-331</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure.. it would be internesting to hear it from someone who uses it...

Although, like a review said: gOS is a JOKE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure.. it would be internesting to hear it from someone who uses it&#8230;</p>
<p>Although, like a review said: gOS is a JOKE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Em</title>
		<link>http://www.internetling.com/2008/03/01/cloudbook-laptop-from-everex-is-it-the-way-to-go-or-just-way-too-slow/comment-page-1/#comment-329</link>
		<dc:creator>Em</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetling.com/2008/03/01/cloudbook-laptop-from-everex-is-it-the-way-to-go-or-just-way-too-slow/#comment-329</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t most of the slowdown due to gOS jumping off the original choice of an E17 based desktop and onto Gnome which has slowed things down somewhat on the cloudbook specification.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t most of the slowdown due to gOS jumping off the original choice of an E17 based desktop and onto Gnome which has slowed things down somewhat on the cloudbook specification.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
