<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Advanced Linux Distributions You Should Try</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.internetling.com/2008/11/23/advanced-linux-distributions-you-should-try/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.internetling.com/2008/11/23/advanced-linux-distributions-you-should-try/</link>
	<description>Linux, opensource and me</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 16:52:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dualbootboy</title>
		<link>http://www.internetling.com/2008/11/23/advanced-linux-distributions-you-should-try/comment-page-2/#comment-6349</link>
		<dc:creator>Dualbootboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 17:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetling.com/?p=146#comment-6349</guid>
		<description>Archlinux is the best advanced linux distro IMHO,I&#039;m into my 2nd month using Linux OS(first 2 distros Fedora and Ubuntu),so I wanted to try something advanced like Gentoo and Archlinux,and I must say Gentoo was a very horrible experience I can&#039;t believe I wasted so much time on this distro :sad and even ended up formating my windows hda0 partition to fat32 from ntfs :(.
Installing Archlinux was a rather good experience and I succeded the first try their wiki pages are so well written,right now I&#039;m loving it its fast and with kdemod it looks good.

Is Slackware really a advanced distro ?I thought it was fairly easy to setup and to workaround.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Archlinux is the best advanced linux distro IMHO,I&#8217;m into my 2nd month using Linux OS(first 2 distros Fedora and Ubuntu),so I wanted to try something advanced like Gentoo and Archlinux,and I must say Gentoo was a very horrible experience I can&#8217;t believe I wasted so much time on this distro :sad and even ended up formating my windows hda0 partition to fat32 from ntfs <img src='http://www.internetling.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> .<br />
Installing Archlinux was a rather good experience and I succeded the first try their wiki pages are so well written,right now I&#8217;m loving it its fast and with kdemod it looks good.</p>
<p>Is Slackware really a advanced distro ?I thought it was fairly easy to setup and to workaround.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xen0blade</title>
		<link>http://www.internetling.com/2008/11/23/advanced-linux-distributions-you-should-try/comment-page-2/#comment-6345</link>
		<dc:creator>xen0blade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 09:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetling.com/?p=146#comment-6345</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve tried all three and this is what I&#039;ve found:  Gentoo: Wouldn&#039;t install.  At all.  Fail.   Slackware.  Couldn&#039;t get wireless working in a reasonable amount of time.  No section on daemons in the Slackware Book either (whoops...).  Arch: Installed easily, runs great, pacman is better then...sliced apt-get...and it&#039;s stable.  If the mirrors would ALSO have a rolling schedule (instead of all going down at once....) that would be nice, but other than that, it clearly wins all three.  Oh, and for Gentoo&#039;s sake...If I wanted to spend 90 percent of my time fiddling with my laptop, and 10 percent actually using it, I probably would be using Gentoo.  Don&#039;t get me wrong, I like all three, but based on my current hardware, it&#039;s Arch all the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve tried all three and this is what I&#8217;ve found:  Gentoo: Wouldn&#8217;t install.  At all.  Fail.   Slackware.  Couldn&#8217;t get wireless working in a reasonable amount of time.  No section on daemons in the Slackware Book either (whoops&#8230;).  Arch: Installed easily, runs great, pacman is better then&#8230;sliced apt-get&#8230;and it&#8217;s stable.  If the mirrors would ALSO have a rolling schedule (instead of all going down at once&#8230;.) that would be nice, but other than that, it clearly wins all three.  Oh, and for Gentoo&#8217;s sake&#8230;If I wanted to spend 90 percent of my time fiddling with my laptop, and 10 percent actually using it, I probably would be using Gentoo.  Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I like all three, but based on my current hardware, it&#8217;s Arch all the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linux Mint 7 Review, Screenshot Tour and Love &#124; Internetling</title>
		<link>http://www.internetling.com/2008/11/23/advanced-linux-distributions-you-should-try/comment-page-2/#comment-6254</link>
		<dc:creator>Linux Mint 7 Review, Screenshot Tour and Love &#124; Internetling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 19:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetling.com/?p=146#comment-6254</guid>
		<description>[...] by Greg, under Linux, Open source, Reviews.       It&#8217;s been almost a year since I switched to Arch Linux, an elegant and simple Linux distribution. I had a Windows XP install on the other partition. I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by Greg, under Linux, Open source, Reviews.       It&#8217;s been almost a year since I switched to Arch Linux, an elegant and simple Linux distribution. I had a Windows XP install on the other partition. I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://www.internetling.com/2008/11/23/advanced-linux-distributions-you-should-try/comment-page-2/#comment-6026</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 10:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetling.com/?p=146#comment-6026</guid>
		<description>A lot of people ask : why no fedora?

fedora is not an advanced os as described in the article.

The article goes about linux-distro&#039;s which you have to configure yourself to get a working system the way you want it. (and that gives a big learning curve)

Fedora is designed to be &quot;plug and play&quot;, I mean put the install-medium in, press &quot;install&quot; and get a working desktop without effort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of people ask : why no fedora?</p>
<p>fedora is not an advanced os as described in the article.</p>
<p>The article goes about linux-distro&#8217;s which you have to configure yourself to get a working system the way you want it. (and that gives a big learning curve)</p>
<p>Fedora is designed to be &#8220;plug and play&#8221;, I mean put the install-medium in, press &#8220;install&#8221; and get a working desktop without effort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: totedati</title>
		<link>http://www.internetling.com/2008/11/23/advanced-linux-distributions-you-should-try/comment-page-2/#comment-4562</link>
		<dc:creator>totedati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 19:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetling.com/?p=146#comment-4562</guid>
		<description>well, for someone who want to try &amp; test gentoo distro is a better and more quick way to do that:

use sabayon linux ... is a gentoo based livedvd distro who, now, with the bird of entropy binary package manager is growing in to a full and distinct linux distro</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, for someone who want to try &amp; test gentoo distro is a better and more quick way to do that:</p>
<p>use sabayon linux &#8230; is a gentoo based livedvd distro who, now, with the bird of entropy binary package manager is growing in to a full and distinct linux distro</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.internetling.com/2008/11/23/advanced-linux-distributions-you-should-try/comment-page-2/#comment-4561</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 12:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetling.com/?p=146#comment-4561</guid>
		<description>winrar old ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>winrar old <img src='http://www.internetling.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eladiaanype</title>
		<link>http://www.internetling.com/2008/11/23/advanced-linux-distributions-you-should-try/comment-page-2/#comment-3271</link>
		<dc:creator>eladiaanype</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 00:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetling.com/?p=146#comment-3271</guid>
		<description>hello it is test. WinRAR provides the full RAR and ZIP file support, can decompress CAB, GZIP, ACE and other archive formats.
nncuywdelzzfqyocptoxmafpuzlurdickdthello</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello it is test. WinRAR provides the full RAR and ZIP file support, can decompress CAB, GZIP, ACE and other archive formats.<br />
nncuywdelzzfqyocptoxmafpuzlurdickdthello</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Looking Back: popular Internetling Linux articles of 2008 &#187; Linux, open source and me at Internetling dot com</title>
		<link>http://www.internetling.com/2008/11/23/advanced-linux-distributions-you-should-try/comment-page-2/#comment-3211</link>
		<dc:creator>Looking Back: popular Internetling Linux articles of 2008 &#187; Linux, open source and me at Internetling dot com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 10:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetling.com/?p=146#comment-3211</guid>
		<description>[...] Advanced Linux Distributions You Should Try [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Advanced Linux Distributions You Should Try [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Ooi</title>
		<link>http://www.internetling.com/2008/11/23/advanced-linux-distributions-you-should-try/comment-page-2/#comment-3203</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Ooi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 08:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetling.com/?p=146#comment-3203</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t had chance to try any of the distribution yet. But I love Ubuntu, PuppyLinux and Slax.

Thanks

Patrick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t had chance to try any of the distribution yet. But I love Ubuntu, PuppyLinux and Slax.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p>Patrick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alizee</title>
		<link>http://www.internetling.com/2008/11/23/advanced-linux-distributions-you-should-try/comment-page-2/#comment-1577</link>
		<dc:creator>alizee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 09:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetling.com/?p=146#comment-1577</guid>
		<description>I really liked your blog. Very useful information, I read it detail, also book-marked it and will be back in the future to read some more of your interesting posts ! keep up the good work..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really liked your blog. Very useful information, I read it detail, also book-marked it and will be back in the future to read some more of your interesting posts ! keep up the good work..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->