Comments on: Advanced Linux Distributions You Should Try

By: seo

seo — Tue, 29 Nov 2011 12:26:17 +0000

any times they act on anecdotal, flawed, or even no evidence at all which results in even more damage to the environment than if they would have never acted at all.

By: Böcek ilaçlama

Böcek ilaçlama — Tue, 29 Nov 2011 12:24:51 +0000

Thank you for this information I was looking for this issue since

By: car hire slovenia

car hire slovenia — Thu, 03 Nov 2011 20:41:12 +0000

I haven’t had chance to try any of the distribution yet. But I love Ubuntu, PuppyLinux and Slax

By: Articles You May Want To Read XI | ~!!!~

Articles You May Want To Read XI | ~~~!!!~~~ — Thu, 09 Jun 2011 00:31:13 +0000

[...] 26. Advanced Linux Distributions You Should Try http://www.internetling.com/2008/11/…ou-should-try/ 27. OSS for companies: Main complaints about Linux [...]

By: Dualbootboy

Dualbootboy — Thu, 03 Sep 2009 17:55:59 +0000

Archlinux is the best advanced linux distro IMHO,I’m into my 2nd month using Linux OS(first 2 distros Fedora and Ubuntu),so I wanted to try something advanced like Gentoo and Archlinux,and I must say Gentoo was a very horrible experience I can’t believe I wasted so much time on this distro :sad and even ended up formating my windows hda0 partition to fat32 from ntfs .
Installing Archlinux was a rather good experience and I succeded the first try their wiki pages are so well written,right now I’m loving it its fast and with kdemod it looks good.

Is Slackware really a advanced distro ?I thought it was fairly easy to setup and to workaround.

By: xen0blade

xen0blade — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 09:37:38 +0000

I’ve tried all three and this is what I’ve found: Gentoo: Wouldn’t install. At all. Fail. Slackware. Couldn’t get wireless working in a reasonable amount of time. No section on daemons in the Slackware Book either (whoops…). Arch: Installed easily, runs great, pacman is better then…sliced apt-get…and it’s stable. If the mirrors would ALSO have a rolling schedule (instead of all going down at once….) that would be nice, but other than that, it clearly wins all three. Oh, and for Gentoo’s sake…If I wanted to spend 90 percent of my time fiddling with my laptop, and 10 percent actually using it, I probably would be using Gentoo. Don’t get me wrong, I like all three, but based on my current hardware, it’s Arch all the way.

By: Linux Mint 7 Review, Screenshot Tour and Love | Internetling

Linux Mint 7 Review, Screenshot Tour and Love | Internetling — Mon, 10 Aug 2009 19:06:55 +0000

[...] by Greg, under Linux, Open source, Reviews. It’s been almost a year since I switched to Arch Linux, an elegant and simple Linux distribution. I had a Windows XP install on the other partition. I [...]

By: tom

tom — Mon, 22 Jun 2009 10:00:28 +0000

A lot of people ask : why no fedora?

fedora is not an advanced os as described in the article.

The article goes about linux-distro’s which you have to configure yourself to get a working system the way you want it. (and that gives a big learning curve)

Fedora is designed to be “plug and play”, I mean put the install-medium in, press “install” and get a working desktop without effort.

By: totedati

totedati — Sun, 01 Feb 2009 19:51:10 +0000

well, for someone who want to try & test gentoo distro is a better and more quick way to do that:

use sabayon linux … is a gentoo based livedvd distro who, now, with the bird of entropy binary package manager is growing in to a full and distinct linux distro

By: Alex

Alex — Sun, 01 Feb 2009 12:13:14 +0000

winrar old