Comments on: Windows 7, the KDE 3.5 Wannabe?

By: Windows7模仿Linux? | 51NOC无忧网管中心

Windows7模仿Linux? | 51NOC无忧网管中心 — Wed, 21 Dec 2011 20:59:04 +0000

[...] 当然，也有 Blogger 认为 Windows 7 的桌面更像 KDE 3.5.X ，也来对比一下 Windows 7 PCLinuxOS, KDE 3.5.x Kubuntu with KDE 3.5.x OpenSuse with KDE [...]

By: seo

seo — Tue, 29 Nov 2011 12:46:38 +0000

Windows 7 is a step forward from Vista, at least as far as the GUI is concerned. Aside from the removal of some annoying Vista bells and whistles and the new Peek and Snap window-management enhancements, it is difficult not to notice the resemblance between Microsoft’s much-touted revamped Aero and the excellent, now 3-years old, KDE 3.5.x.

By: Böcek ilaçlama

Böcek ilaçlama — Tue, 29 Nov 2011 12:46:17 +0000

During my daily feed-skimming I noticed that the people at ZDNet got their hands on the first (and apparently only) beta of the new Vista savior, Windows 7. The review features screenshots and I must say, even though it has not convinced me,

By: Mark Cowan

Mark Cowan — Tue, 07 Jun 2011 11:26:40 +0000

They both look like a smoothened, blue version of Windows 95. Congratulations.

They feel totally different though – I personally hate KDE (I can see why others would like it though), and out of all the OS’s, Windows XP is still my favourite for look+feel+speed… Maybe I’ll go back to it if Ubuntu still fails to support an office suite of similar functionality to MSOffice 2000 by the time I finish uni…

By: Testando Sistemas Operacionais através de Máquinas Virtuais (VMs) » Jonathas Rodrigues

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 02:10:05 +0000

[...] seria KDE 3.5? o_0 haha Fontes sobre o que eu to falando: Internetling e Quartoestudio Se não é plágio, então o que é? O KDE 3.5 existe já há muito mais tempo que [...]

By: The great boot race - Vista/Win7/Ubuntu (9.04/9.10) - Page 2 - openSUSE Forums

The great boot race - Vista/Win7/Ubuntu (9.04/9.10) - Page 2 - openSUSE Forums — Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:45:59 +0000

[...] the Win7 toolbar seems very similar to the KDE 3.5 one. Here's a link to an article all about it: Windows 7, the KDE 3.5 Wannabe? | Internetling __________________ Muhammad BJ Linux addict since August [...]

By: Bobby

Bobby — Sun, 27 Dec 2009 20:20:35 +0000

@ Dan Harvell. I am a Linux user and lover ever since I discovered the OS. There were times in the past years that Linux could really be painful to set up the way that one wants it to but that taught me a lot and today I can really consider a lot of Windows users as ignorant and unaware when compared with the least among Linux users.
Windows is obviously programmed for such people and to get them hooked like crack addicts.
However, I have to agree with you to a certain extent although I have to say that it’s not really Linux’s fault.

By default there are a lot more hardware that work with Linux than do with Windows. One can also do a lot more with Linux than with Windows on a default installation BUT there are a lot of hardware manufacturers out there that write drivers FOR Windows – that’s the big difference.
That’s why some programmes and/or hardware don’t work as well on Linux as they do on Windows.

If hardware vendors would stand behind Linux half as much as they do behind Windows then I could guarantee you that Windows would be DEAD in the very near future. The same applies to companies that write software for Windows. But they most likely won’t do that (stand behind Linux) because these are proprietary vendors who go to bed with M$. They are all in the same boat, all grinding the same axe. In the meantime Linux continues to grow from strength to strenth and like the laws of nature, nothing can stop it.

By: Dan Harvell

Dan Harvell — Sun, 27 Dec 2009 18:32:46 +0000

I am not a fan of Microsoft, at all. People who know me also know that I rather despise MS. The problem, however, is – regardless the impressive advances Linux has made in the past decade, it is still a very unstable environment. By unstable, I do not mean it crashes every 5 minutes, like Windows. I mean that Linux is unpredictable how it will behave among the various hardware combinations that are out there. What workds really well for one user will be a disaster with another. And that is just the OS. The available applications have a lot of maturing to do, as well. As a professional photographer, I find that GIMP just does not have the robust features that Photoshop has. Sure, you can do a lot with GIMP, but just not as well as Photoshop. Does Photoshop have a Linux port? Nope. Does it work well with WINE? Questionable. CS3 works okay, but not very stable. I use CS4 which does not even install, under WINE. In short, Linux has impressed me with its growth over the past several years. But Windows remains a polished operating system that just works under all hardware combinations (PC-wise, that is). If you know what you are doing, you can use Windows securely. But, I anxiously await the day that Linux becomes the reliable, polished operating system that Windows has become.

By: Austrija Skijanje

Austrija Skijanje — Mon, 14 Dec 2009 19:21:28 +0000

I juste rad xp vs win7..and it definitely win7 is winner by many criteria.

By: Italija Skijanje

Italija Skijanje — Tue, 01 Dec 2009 20:06:27 +0000

I had a problem with windows 7 to put my picture on samsung lcd tv.With xp all working fine.I will try to find something on google for this kind a problem.