<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Readers&#8217; Choice: Awesome Linux Apps that Need Our Attention</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.internetling.com/2009/03/17/readers-choice-awesome-linux-apps-that-need-our-attention/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.internetling.com/2009/03/17/readers-choice-awesome-linux-apps-that-need-our-attention/</link>
	<description>Linux, open source and delicious cake</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:33:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deagon</title>
		<link>http://www.internetling.com/2009/03/17/readers-choice-awesome-linux-apps-that-need-our-attention/comment-page-1/#comment-6371</link>
		<dc:creator>Deagon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 22:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetling.com/?p=183#comment-6371</guid>
		<description>I feel we should be focusing on Distros that are harder to break and ship with easier to use backup &amp; repair tools.

Imagine a situation where a loyal windows noob finally decides to venture into the colourful world of linux. Then breaking his/her Distro Days, maybe even Hours/Minutes after installing it only to find they have to work their way though a mountain of bash commands to (possibly) fix it.

That exact situation scares many user back to their old OS every week. (There was a time 6 years ago when I can remember jumping between various Distros and XP several times for this reason.)

Granted that no repair tool is 100% successful but would the community (especially newcomers) benefit from easier and more powerful tools that can repair the simple stuff? I think so.

I can also see an easy to use backup creator (something that sticks a restore wizard + the backed up data on the medium) going a long way towards making linux more noob friendly.

The simple truth is, most people simply aren&#039;t willing to find &amp; read through a mountain of documents sparsely spread around the corners of the internet and then learn the mountains of commands those docs are filled with, simply figure out how to repair something the rest of us experienced linux users would sniff out and fix in minutes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel we should be focusing on Distros that are harder to break and ship with easier to use backup &amp; repair tools.</p>
<p>Imagine a situation where a loyal windows noob finally decides to venture into the colourful world of linux. Then breaking his/her Distro Days, maybe even Hours/Minutes after installing it only to find they have to work their way though a mountain of bash commands to (possibly) fix it.</p>
<p>That exact situation scares many user back to their old OS every week. (There was a time 6 years ago when I can remember jumping between various Distros and XP several times for this reason.)</p>
<p>Granted that no repair tool is 100% successful but would the community (especially newcomers) benefit from easier and more powerful tools that can repair the simple stuff? I think so.</p>
<p>I can also see an easy to use backup creator (something that sticks a restore wizard + the backed up data on the medium) going a long way towards making linux more noob friendly.</p>
<p>The simple truth is, most people simply aren&#8217;t willing to find &amp; read through a mountain of documents sparsely spread around the corners of the internet and then learn the mountains of commands those docs are filled with, simply figure out how to repair something the rest of us experienced linux users would sniff out and fix in minutes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.internetling.com/2009/03/17/readers-choice-awesome-linux-apps-that-need-our-attention/comment-page-1/#comment-4865</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 12:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetling.com/?p=183#comment-4865</guid>
		<description>1. We need a decent OCR app. Right now, we have two or three pieces of junk.

2. We need a decent app. for syncing Windows Mobile devices. Right now, there is stuff that sometimes works for some people. I had mine working, then it broke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. We need a decent OCR app. Right now, we have two or three pieces of junk.</p>
<p>2. We need a decent app. for syncing Windows Mobile devices. Right now, there is stuff that sometimes works for some people. I had mine working, then it broke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Applesauce</title>
		<link>http://www.internetling.com/2009/03/17/readers-choice-awesome-linux-apps-that-need-our-attention/comment-page-1/#comment-4848</link>
		<dc:creator>Applesauce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 11:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetling.com/?p=183#comment-4848</guid>
		<description>yonnie: It&#039;s OSS&#039;s greatest strength, as well as its greatest weakness. Developers fork constantly and start new projects so they can have the software that has the feature set they want.

It&#039;s a good thing, since all needs are eventually covered, and it allows innovation to flourish. Cool features that work from the forks are eventually integrated into the main branch.

However, this also means a lot of &quot;Reinventing the Wheel&quot; is done and many resources are wasted when they probably didn&#039;t need to be in making &quot;me-too!&quot; technologies.

What&#039;s the solution? Make the code proprietary. But when you do that, you destroy all the other benefits of Open Source. It&#039;s a trade-off. Some types of apps and users simply aren&#039;t fit for the OSS model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yonnie: It&#8217;s OSS&#8217;s greatest strength, as well as its greatest weakness. Developers fork constantly and start new projects so they can have the software that has the feature set they want.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a good thing, since all needs are eventually covered, and it allows innovation to flourish. Cool features that work from the forks are eventually integrated into the main branch.</p>
<p>However, this also means a lot of &#8220;Reinventing the Wheel&#8221; is done and many resources are wasted when they probably didn&#8217;t need to be in making &#8220;me-too!&#8221; technologies.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s the solution? Make the code proprietary. But when you do that, you destroy all the other benefits of Open Source. It&#8217;s a trade-off. Some types of apps and users simply aren&#8217;t fit for the OSS model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.internetling.com/2009/03/17/readers-choice-awesome-linux-apps-that-need-our-attention/comment-page-1/#comment-4846</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 08:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetling.com/?p=183#comment-4846</guid>
		<description>@yonnie

I was talking to a friend about CAD apps on Linux and by doing a Google search I found a lot of commercial apps available. Are they bad?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@yonnie</p>
<p>I was talking to a friend about CAD apps on Linux and by doing a Google search I found a lot of commercial apps available. Are they bad?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yonnie</title>
		<link>http://www.internetling.com/2009/03/17/readers-choice-awesome-linux-apps-that-need-our-attention/comment-page-1/#comment-4845</link>
		<dc:creator>yonnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 03:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetling.com/?p=183#comment-4845</guid>
		<description>Linux needs a good working version of:
a) gnucash, with invoicing, shippers, double-ledgers,etc...
b) gEDA, needs a lot of help especially gScheme
c) something CAD, that can read/write/create autocad files and use autocad libraries
d) gimp, spend days trying to figure it out, too tough to remember.  Too many widgets that don&#039;t seem to do anything till you&#039;ve screwed it up, features that interfere with other features, etc...

Linux has too many duplicate office suites and other halfway-ware.  Why not focus on one and complete it?  Open Office is pretty good now, why not spend more energy on it?

Linux has too many players and few that actually work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Linux needs a good working version of:<br />
a) gnucash, with invoicing, shippers, double-ledgers,etc&#8230;<br />
b) gEDA, needs a lot of help especially gScheme<br />
c) something CAD, that can read/write/create autocad files and use autocad libraries<br />
d) gimp, spend days trying to figure it out, too tough to remember.  Too many widgets that don&#8217;t seem to do anything till you&#8217;ve screwed it up, features that interfere with other features, etc&#8230;</p>
<p>Linux has too many duplicate office suites and other halfway-ware.  Why not focus on one and complete it?  Open Office is pretty good now, why not spend more energy on it?</p>
<p>Linux has too many players and few that actually work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vadim P.</title>
		<link>http://www.internetling.com/2009/03/17/readers-choice-awesome-linux-apps-that-need-our-attention/comment-page-1/#comment-4834</link>
		<dc:creator>Vadim P.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 02:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetling.com/?p=183#comment-4834</guid>
		<description>@Rober: Ok, a video editing program (one thing that Linux does lack, but imho stuff like Pitivi is working on fixing).

What else though?

We have browsers, IM, skype, word processors, music players... what else is missing for the common user?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Rober: Ok, a video editing program (one thing that Linux does lack, but imho stuff like Pitivi is working on fixing).</p>
<p>What else though?</p>
<p>We have browsers, IM, skype, word processors, music players&#8230; what else is missing for the common user?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rober Heron</title>
		<link>http://www.internetling.com/2009/03/17/readers-choice-awesome-linux-apps-that-need-our-attention/comment-page-1/#comment-4833</link>
		<dc:creator>Rober Heron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 02:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetling.com/?p=183#comment-4833</guid>
		<description>Gscrot is bad but FLOSS has a long distinguished list of idiotic names like Gimp, the cripppled Photochop or Jokosher, which allows religious fanatics to enjoy their food virtually.

What we need is less navel gazing like docking bars and more useful programs that Gnu-Linux is still missing like a simple editing software like Imovie or Windows program I cant remember now to edit home videos. 
I said simple, not optionless.

Mom and pop want to take their digital camera on a trip and take the pictures and video clips, maybe crop the ends of the clips, put them together with transition/effects, maybe add a soundtrack to it and maybe some text. I know KDEnlive and all the others and nothing just works and nothing is simple.

We need to have more easy modes for software so the 5-10 most used functions can be accessed by people with little experience in the LEAST amount of steps possible and for those taht want more, the rest of the software is still there with all its power.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gscrot is bad but FLOSS has a long distinguished list of idiotic names like Gimp, the cripppled Photochop or Jokosher, which allows religious fanatics to enjoy their food virtually.</p>
<p>What we need is less navel gazing like docking bars and more useful programs that Gnu-Linux is still missing like a simple editing software like Imovie or Windows program I cant remember now to edit home videos.<br />
I said simple, not optionless.</p>
<p>Mom and pop want to take their digital camera on a trip and take the pictures and video clips, maybe crop the ends of the clips, put them together with transition/effects, maybe add a soundtrack to it and maybe some text. I know KDEnlive and all the others and nothing just works and nothing is simple.</p>
<p>We need to have more easy modes for software so the 5-10 most used functions can be accessed by people with little experience in the LEAST amount of steps possible and for those taht want more, the rest of the software is still there with all its power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vadim P.</title>
		<link>http://www.internetling.com/2009/03/17/readers-choice-awesome-linux-apps-that-need-our-attention/comment-page-1/#comment-4831</link>
		<dc:creator>Vadim P.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 19:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetling.com/?p=183#comment-4831</guid>
		<description>@jeremy1701: gee, thanks braniac. maybe that&#039;s why it&#039;s not being used anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@jeremy1701: gee, thanks braniac. maybe that&#8217;s why it&#8217;s not being used anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vadim P.</title>
		<link>http://www.internetling.com/2009/03/17/readers-choice-awesome-linux-apps-that-need-our-attention/comment-page-1/#comment-4830</link>
		<dc:creator>Vadim P.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 19:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetling.com/?p=183#comment-4830</guid>
		<description>Doesn&#039;t seem so &#039;amazing&#039; to me. For one, I can&#039;t even find their homepage (and the Saleena trac page is the generic one).

Which is understandable as it seems to be at a 0.1 release. But please don&#039;t spam as it being amazing ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t seem so &#8216;amazing&#8217; to me. For one, I can&#8217;t even find their homepage (and the Saleena trac page is the generic one).</p>
<p>Which is understandable as it seems to be at a 0.1 release. But please don&#8217;t spam as it being amazing <img src='http://www.internetling.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeremy1701</title>
		<link>http://www.internetling.com/2009/03/17/readers-choice-awesome-linux-apps-that-need-our-attention/comment-page-1/#comment-4829</link>
		<dc:creator>jeremy1701</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetling.com/?p=183#comment-4829</guid>
		<description>Gscrot??? Worst name ever!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gscrot??? Worst name ever!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
